data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f85fb/f85fb17bc8bb6b504ff918fc01111926c4c73cbe" alt=""
The Sin Jagmohan Never Committed!
( Kashmir Rechords Exclusive)
As the people of Jammu and Kashmir continue to express faith in the democratic and developmental potential of India and when suddenly local politicians of Kashmir are extending goodwill messages for the return of displaced Kashmiri Pandits, it’s imperative to revisit the false narratives surrounding the late Governor Jagmohan, who was wrongly blamed for the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the valley. These fake and false narratives are being pedaled since 1990 against Jagmohan, holding him responsible for the unfortunate exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from valley. It was mainly used as a cover both by Pakistani movers and shakers of Kashmir militancy and equally by the mainstream politicians along with a large component of Kashmir’s intelligentsia. All this was done to orchestrate a shield to save them from the guilt trip that they felt would likely see them in their faces either due to their inability to call a spade a spade at that point in time or due to their own culpability at times.
Despite efforts by Governor Jagmohan to dispel these accusations, vested interests perpetuated these falsehoods, shielding themselves from accountability. However, history holds the key to rectifying these misconceptions, as evidenced by the recent Supreme Court judgment on Article 370, which calls for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to be set up for moving forward. The same should of course also incorporate the role of the then Governor Jagmohan to set the record straight.
Jagmohan’s Appeal that Got Lost
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a588/5a5881c86e5e1fc4172d26fead08e313ac8488a1" alt=""
Records available with Kashmir Rechords provide ample evidence of Governor Jagmohan’s attempts to dissuade Kashmiri Pandits from leaving the valley. In a public appeal, he urged them to stay, offering to set up temporary camps and allocate land for their resettlement in Srinagar. The prominent newspapers of the then J&K State including Kashmir Times and Daily Excelsior had prominently given space on their front pages to Jagmohan’s appeal to Pandits not to leave Kashmir .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fd43/7fd43867f997b2c70efb3baaf68eaad9d8cd0043" alt=""
Comment
Bansi Lal Shah
First of all pl assess the numbers of KPs that had come out of the valley upto the time this so called appeal of J&K government had appeared in the Newspaper.
2. Pl delve on the matter why, as per the editor-in-chief of Srinagar times, as is said to have appeared in his columns that Late Jagmohan had himself prepared tea at Rajbhawan for them because no aid was available.
3. Why were pre 19th January 1990 the MLAs, MLCs and others close to political dispensation then been constantly issuing declarations on press “Mei Mukhbir Nahi houn”. To whom would the KPs look forward for help and protection should they have thought for return on or after 8th March while targetting the KPs in the valley had not stopped.
4. If the so called appeal is authenticated, why then the government release salary of KPs employees “based on the grade pay and 50 percent of DA till their pay particulars were authenticated from their parent offices at Srinagar”.
5. Why would the government have allocated plots to the returning KPs at that time when even the distress sales had not been conceptualized and only vulnerable lots among KPs had moved out of valled till then.
6. Didn’t the KPs co-operate help the government to operate the offices, banks, Central offices etc by agreeing to work under security cover.
7. Why the government failed even at that time to protect anyone moving out of the circle of security urged by their personal priorities like visiting their homes.
The above are some points to express that KPs had neither moved away from their homes and hearths out of their fancy or moods or please and nor had they refrained to obey the so called government appeal to return because they were enjoying the conform and hospitality they felt placed in while away from their homes or out of cowardice as the narrative is being allowed to be carried out.
It clearly appears that efforts are afoot towards a blamegame which is very very unfortunate.
KPs today are given to many a disturbing, distressing and frustrating circumstances pushed to the wall where they can hardly be prevented to look towards elements, howsoever least trustworthy, as their saviours.