When two iconic lakes nearly shared a dream of floating restaurants, Shikaras and houseboats (Kashmir…
The Unfinished stories of other Kashmiri Pandits who refused to leave Kashmir in 1990! (Kashmir…
(Kashmir Rechords Exclusive) During the brief but eventful Sikh rule over Kashmir, the Valley saw…
(Kashmir Rechords Exclusive) In the late 19th century, far from his home in England, a…
Banning 25 Books in J&K: Shielding Minds or Selling Narratives? The government’s recent ban on…
(Kashmir Rechords Exclusive) Has the visionary artist, activist and cultural conscience-keeper faded from the memory…
View Comments
First of all pl assess the numbers of KPs that had come out of the valley upto the time this so called appeal of J&K government had appeared in the Newspaper.
2. Pl delve on the matter why, as per the editor-in-chief of Srinagar times, as is said to have appeared in his columns that Late Jagmohan had himself prepared tea at Rajbhawan for them because no aid was available.
3. Why were pre 19th January 1990 the MLAs, MLCs and others close to political dispensation then been constantly issuing declarations on press "Mei Mukhbir Nahi houn". To whom would the KPs look forward for help and protection should they have thought for return on or after 8th March while targetting the KPs in the valley had not stopped.
4. If the so called appeal is authenticated, why then the government release salary of KPs employees "based on the grade pay and 50 percent of DA till their pay particulars were authenticated from their parent offices at Srinagar".
5. Why would the government have allocated plots to the returning KPs at that time when even the distress sales had not been conceptualized and only vulnerable lots among KPs had moved out of valled till then.
6. Didn't the KPs co-operate help the government to operate the offices, banks, Central offices etc by agreeing to work under security cover.
7. Why the government failed even at that time to protect anyone moving out of the circle of security urged by their personal priorities like visiting their homes.
The above are some points to express that KPs had neither moved away from their homes and hearths out of their fancy or moods or please and nor had they refrained to obey the so called government appeal to return because they were enjoying the conform and hospitality they felt placed in while away from their homes or out of cowardice as the narrative is being allowed to be carried out.
It clearly appears that efforts are afoot towards a blamegame which is very very unfortunate.
KPs today are given to many a disturbing, distressing and frustrating circumstances pushed to the wall where they can hardly be prevented to look towards elements, howsoever least trustworthy, as their saviours.